SUBSCRIBE

Breaking News on Food Marketing and Retailing

Headlines > Consumer Trends

Read more breaking news

 

 

Salt reduction and social inequality? UK reduction policies 'have not reached those most in need'

1 comment

By Nathan Gray+

27-Aug-2014
Last updated on 27-Aug-2014 at 15:35 GMT

"Whilst we are pleased to record an average national reduction in salt consumption coming from food of nearly a gram per day, we are disappointed to find out that the benefits of such a programme have not reached those most in need,”

Despite overall drops in salt intake over last 10 years, social inequalities in salt intake have hardly changed in the period, say researchers.

The study, published in the BMJ Open journal, paper is the first to monitor social inequalities following the national salt reduction programme and analysed salt intake data in Britain between 2000-01 and 2011 - finding that people from low socio-economic positions still eat more salt than those from higher socio-economic positions.

Led by Professor Francesco Cappuccio from the World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Nutrition, based at Warwick Medical School, the authors of the study looked at the geographical distribution of habitual dietary salt intake in Britain and its association with manual occupations and educational attainments - both indicators of socio-economic position and key determinants of health.

"Whilst we are pleased to record an average national reduction in salt consumption coming from food of nearly a gram per day, we are disappointed to find out that the benefits of such a programme have not reached those most in need,” said Cappuccio.

“These results are important as people of low socio-economic background are more likely to develop high blood pressure (hypertension) and to suffer disproportionately from strokes, heart attacks and renal failure."

Commenting on the research findings, Katharine Jenner, campaign director at Consensus Action on Salt and Health (CASH) told FoodNavigator that by targeting everyday foods, the salt UK reduction programme 'is benefitting the entire population, including those less educated.'

"However, in order to reach those most in need more effectively, manufacturers who sell them the most products need to do a lot more," she added. "It is immoral to make the unhealthy option the cheaper or easier option; good quality nutritious food should be available for all.”

Study details

The researchers used the British National Diet and Nutrition Survey (2008-11), a national representative sample of 1,027 men and women aged 19-64 years living in Britain. Salt intake was assessed with a four-day food diary, assessing salt consumption from food. Salt added by consumers at the table and during cooking (discretionary salt) was not measured.

Cappuccio and his colleagues revealed a significant reduction in dietary salt consumption from 2000-1 to 2008-11 of 0.9g of salt per day - consistent with the total reduction in salt consumption of 1.4g per day reported nationally when also discretionary use of salt is taken into account.

However, dietary sodium intake varied significantly across socioeconomic groups, even when adjusting for geographical variations, they added.

“There was higher dietary sodium intake in people with the lowest educational attainment and in low levels of occupation,” wrote the researchers.

Indeed, those with no qualification had, on average, a 5.7% higher dietary sodium intake than the reference group, the team revealed.

"The diet of disadvantaged socio-economic groups tends to be made up of low-quality, salt-dense, high-fat, high-calorie unhealthy cheap foods,” warned Cappuccio.

“We have seen a reduction in salt intake in Britain thanks to a policy, which included awareness campaigns, food reformulation and monitoring. However, clearly poorer households still have less healthy shopping baskets and the broad reformulation of foods high in salt has not reached them as much as we would have hoped."

"In our continued effort to reduce population salt intake towards a 6g per day target in Britain, it is crucial to understand the reasons for these social inequalities so as to correct this gap for an equitable and cost-effective delivery of cardiovascular prevention," he concluded.

Source: BMJ Open
Published online, Open Access, doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005683
“Socioeconomic inequality in salt intake in Britain 10 years after a national salt reduction programme”
Authors: Chen Ji, Francesco P Cappuccio

Post a comment

1 comment

How far should we go?

Assuming the data support the conclusions,what level of intervention is our society prepared to accept? This data suggests that the combination of industry action and education has failed to impact this "less-educated" group.

Should we retain our traditional freedoms, accept that this group is beyond help and merely provide support for their orphans?

Should we legislate to remove sodium from all foods thereby guaranteeing that this group is helped? (And support our redundant dairy farmers?)?

Should we put this group (or the whole population?) on a government-defined, rationed diet?

None of these seems a particularly palatable (if you'll excuse the pun) option but it would be nice to see a mature debate on the subject that has for too long been painted as evil corporations battling with spittle-flecked prophets (depending on your viewpoint). I believe that there are elements here that actually touch on the balance of individual freedom and the power of the state.

Report abuse

Posted by Dave Peters
01 September 2014 | 14h12

Key Industry Events

 

Access all events listing

Our events, Events from partners...