Breaking News on Food Marketing and Retailing

Headlines > Retail

Mushroom cartel: EU fines canned mushroom producers in antitrust settlement

Mushroom cartel: EU fines canned mushroom producers in antitrust settlement

The European Commission (EC) has fined three producers of canned mushrooms more than €32 million after it ruled that they participated in a cartel to coordinate prices throughout Europe.

The Commission ruled that the cartel made up of three canned mushroom producers - Lutèce, Prochamp and Bonduelle – fixed prices and worked together to allocate customers for more than a year.

Dutch mushroom producer Lutèce did not face after it received immunity for revealing the existence of the cartel to the Commission, while Prochamp also benefitted from fine reductions, said the EC.

"The cartel for canned mushrooms, which aimed to avoid a fall in prices, covered sales to retailers throughout Europe for more than a year,” explained Joaquín Almunia, Commission Vice President in charge of competition policy. “This means that potentially, all consumers may have been affected.”

“After the shrimps cartel at the end of last year, this is yet another cartel penalised by the Commission in the food sector, where it is essential to protect European consumers against anticompetitive practices."

The three firms received a reduced fine after agreeing to settle the case, while a fourth firm named as Spanish firm Riberebro is still under investigation by the EC under its standard (non-settlement) cartel procedure.

Mushroom cartel

Canned mushrooms are mushrooms sold in tins and jars. The cartel covered the sales of private label canned mushrooms via tender procedures to retailers and food wholesaler, including cash and carry companies and professional customers such as catering companies in the European Economic Area (EEA).

The overall aim of the cartelists was to stabilise the market shares of the companies involved and stop the decline of prices, said the Commission. To achieve this aim the cartel members exchanged confidential information on tenders, set minimum prices, agreed on volume targets and allocated customers. 

The cartel was a non-aggression pact with a compensation scheme in case of customer transfer and application of minimum prices which had been agreed beforehand. 

The infringement lasted from 1 September 2010 to respectively 22 December 2011 for Lutèce and 28 February 2012, for Prochamp and Bonduelle.

Under the Commission's 2006 Leniency Notice, Lutèce received full immunity for revealing the existence of the cartel and thereby avoided a fine of € 20.7 million for its participation in the infringement; Prochamp received a reduction of 30% for cooperating with the investigation, said the Commission.

“Moreover, under the Commission's 2008 Settlement Notice, the Commission further reduced the fines imposed on all three undertakings by 10% as they acknowledged their participation in the cartel and their liability in this respect.”

Subscribe to our FREE newsletter

Get FREE access to authoritative breaking news, videos, podcasts, webinars and white papers. SUBSCRIBE

Post a comment

Comment title *
Your comment *
Your name *
Your email *

We will not publish your email on the site

I agree to Terms and Conditions

These comments have not been moderated. You are encouraged to participate with comments that are relevant to our news stories. You should not post comments that are abusive, threatening, defamatory, misleading or invasive of privacy. For the full terms and conditions for commenting see clause 7 of our Terms and Conditions ‘Participating in Online Communities’. These terms may be updated from time to time, so please read them before posting a comment. Any comment that violates these terms may be removed in its entirety as we do not edit comments. If you wish to complain about a comment please use the "REPORT ABUSE" button or contact the editors.